Ecological Archives E090-187-A2

T. U. Berendonk, K. Spitze, and W. C. Kerfoot. 2009. Ephemeral metapopulations show high genetic diversity at regional scales. Ecology 90:2670–2675.

Appendix B. Data on number of alleles (Na), number of effective alleles (Ne), observed heterozygosity (Ho), expected heterozygostiy (He), and fixation index (F) for each locus for each population and species.

TABLE B1. Shown are the number of alleles (Na), number of effective alles (Ne), observed heterozygosity (Ho), expected heterozygosity (He) and Fixation Index (F) for each locus in each population of C. flavicans.

Population

Locus

Na

Ne

Ho

He

F

S–Italy 1

FL01

4.000

3.329

0.708

0.700

-0.012

 

FL04

7.000

5.236

0.792

0.809

0.021

 

FL07

5.000

2.510

0.583

0.602

0.030

 

FL05

7.000

3.972

0.750

0.748

-0.002

 

FL08

5.000

4.902

0.792

0.796

0.005

 

FL14

5.000

2.228

0.542

0.551

0.017

S–Italy 2

FL01

4.000

3.589

0.708

0.721

0.018

 

FL04

7.000

5.592

0.792

0.821

0.036

 

FL07

5.000

3.048

0.667

0.672

0.008

 

FL05

6.000

4.664

0.792

0.786

-0.008

 

FL08

5.000

4.861

0.792

0.794

0.003

 

FL14

6.000

2.125

0.542

0.530

-0.023

S–Italy 3

FL01

4.000

3.439

0.708

0.709

0.001

 

FL04

6.000

5.009

0.792

0.800

0.011

 

FL07

4.000

3.056

0.667

0.673

0.009

 

FL05

5.000

3.892

0.708

0.743

0.047

 

FL08

5.000

3.408

0.708

0.707

-0.002

 

FL14

6.000

2.723

0.625

0.633

0.012

S–Italy 4

FL01

4.000

3.122

0.708

0.680

-0.042

 

FL04

7.000

5.460

0.792

0.817

0.031

 

FL07

5.000

3.634

0.750

0.725

-0.035

 

FL05

5.000

4.664

0.750

0.786

0.045

 

FL08

5.000

3.802

0.750

0.737

-0.018

 

FL14

6.000

3.016

0.667

0.668

0.003

N–Germany 1

FL01

4.000

2.624

0.625

0.619

-0.010

 

FL04

5.000

2.984

0.667

0.665

-0.003

 

FL07

5.000

3.301

0.667

0.697

0.044

 

FL05

6.000

3.866

0.708

0.741

0.044

 

FL08

5.000

4.174

0.792

0.760

-0.041

 

FL14

3.000

2.612

0.625

0.617

-0.013

N–Germany 2

FL01

3.000

2.228

0.542

0.551

0.017

 

FL04

5.000

3.339

0.667

0.701

0.048

 

FL07

5.000

3.611

0.750

0.723

-0.037

 

FL05

6.000

4.299

0.750

0.767

0.023

 

FL08

5.000

4.299

0.792

0.767

-0.032

 

FL14

3.000

2.661

0.625

0.624

-0.001

N–Germany 3

FL01

3.000

2.327

0.542

0.570

0.050

 

FL04

5.000

4.159

0.750

0.760

0.013

 

FL07

4.000

2.830

0.667

0.647

-0.031

 

FL05

6.000

4.159

0.750

0.760

0.013

 

FL08

5.000

3.502

0.708

0.714

0.009

 

FL14

4.000

2.356

0.583

0.576

-0.014

N–Germany 4

FL01

3.000

2.571

0.625

0.611

-0.023

 

FL04

5.000

3.556

0.750

0.719

-0.043

 

FL07

5.000

3.000

0.667

0.667

0.000

 

FL05

6.000

3.704

0.750

0.730

-0.027

 

FL08

5.000

3.523

0.750

0.716

-0.047

 

FL14

4.000

2.704

0.625

0.630

0.008

 

TABLE B2. Shown are the number of alleles (Na), number of effective alles (Ne), observed heterozygosity (Ho), expected heterozygostiy (He) and Fixation Index (F) for each locus in each population of C. obscuripes.

Pop

Locus

Na

Ne

Ho

He

F

N–Germany 1

OB12

3.000

2.589

0.583

0.614

0.050

 

OB14

4.000

2.969

0.667

0.663

-0.005

 

OB21

4.000

1.797

0.458

0.444

-0.033

 

OB07

4.000

2.624

0.625

0.619

-0.010

 

OB18

5.000

4.114

0.750

0.757

0.009

 

OB23

2.000

1.986

0.500

0.497

-0.007

N–Germany 2

OB12

4.000

3.263

0.667

0.694

0.039

 

OB14

4.000

3.072

0.667

0.674

0.012

 

OB21

4.000

2.299

0.583

0.565

-0.032

 

OB07

3.000

2.504

0.625

0.601

-0.040

 

OB18

5.000

4.283

0.750

0.766

0.022

 

OB23

2.000

1.986

0.500

0.497

-0.007

N–Germany 3

OB12

4.000

2.924

0.667

0.658

-0.013

 

OB14

4.000

3.245

0.708

0.692

-0.024

 

OB21

6.000

2.817

0.667

0.645

-0.034

 

OB07

3.000

2.510

0.583

0.602

0.030

 

OB18

5.000

3.932

0.708

0.746

0.050

 

OB23

2.000

1.843

0.458

0.457

-0.002

N–Germany 4

OB12

4.000

3.254

0.708

0.693

-0.023

 

OB14

3.000

2.395

0.583

0.582

-0.001

 

OB21

2.000

1.917

0.458

0.478

0.042

 

OB07

3.000

2.337

0.583

0.572

-0.020

 

OB18

5.000

3.777

0.708

0.735

0.037

 

OB23

2.000

1.946

0.500

0.486

-0.029

S–France 1

OB12

3.000

1.917

0.458

0.478

0.042

 

OB14

4.000

2.186

0.542

0.543

0.002

 

OB21

5.000

2.462

0.583

0.594

0.018

 

OB07

3.000

2.380

0.583

0.580

-0.006

 

OB18

7.000

4.800

0.792

0.792

0.000

 

OB23

7.000

4.465

0.750

0.776

0.034

S–France 2

OB12

4.000

2.380

0.583

0.580

-0.006

 

OB14

2.000

1.946

0.500

0.486

-0.029

 

OB21

4.000

2.400

0.583

0.583

0.000

 

OB07

3.000

2.366

0.583

0.577

-0.011

 

OB18

7.000

5.512

0.833

0.819

-0.018

 

OB23

7.000

5.818

0.833

0.828

-0.006

S–France 3

OB12

2.000

1.438

0.292

0.305

0.043

 

OB14

3.000

2.133

0.542

0.531

-0.020

 

OB21

4.000

2.436

0.583

0.589

0.010

 

OB07

3.000

2.743

0.667

0.635

-0.049

 

OB18

4.000

3.139

0.667

0.681

0.022

 

OB23

7.000

5.731

0.833

0.826

-0.009

S–France 4

OB12

3.000

2.796

0.625

0.642

0.027

 

OB14

3.000

2.327

0.542

0.570

0.050

 

OB21

5.000

2.830

0.667

0.647

-0.031

 

OB07

3.000

2.796

0.667

0.642

-0.038

 

OB18

6.000

4.702

0.792

0.787

-0.006

 

OB23

6.000

4.448

0.750

0.775

0.032

 

TABLE B3. Shown are the number of alleles (Na), number of effective alles (Ne), observed heterozygosity (Ho), expected heterozygostiy (He) and Fixation Index (F) for each locus in each population of C. crystallinus.

Pop

Locus

Na

Ne

Ho

He

F

N–Germany 1

CY06

4.000

3.048

0.667

0.672

0.008

 

CY07

4.000

2.977

0.667

0.664

-0.004

 

CY11

3.000

2.153

0.542

0.536

-0.011

 

CY02

2.000

1.704

0.417

0.413

-0.008

 

CY05

3.000

2.083

0.542

0.520

-0.042

 

CY08

4.000

1.770

0.417

0.435

0.042

N–Germany 2

CY06

1.000

1.000

0.000

0.000

#NV

 

CY07

4.000

3.310

0.708

0.698

-0.015

 

CY11

3.000

2.182

0.542

0.542

0.000

 

CY02

2.000

1.087

0.083

0.080

-0.043

 

CY05

4.000

2.887

0.625

0.654

0.044

 

CY08

1.000

1.000

0.000

0.000

#NV

N–Germany 3

CY06

1.000

1.000

0.000

0.000

#NV

 

CY07

5.000

2.880

0.625

0.653

0.043

 

CY11

3.000

2.909

0.667

0.656

-0.016

 

CY02

3.000

2.010

0.500

0.503

0.005

 

CY05

3.000

2.488

0.583

0.598

0.025

 

CY08

1.000

1.000

0.000

0.000

#NV

N–Germany 4

CY06

4.000

2.992

0.667

0.666

-0.001

 

CY07

3.000

2.969

0.667

0.663

-0.005

 

CY11

3.000

2.612

0.625

0.617

-0.013

 

CY02

2.000

1.653

0.375

0.395

0.051

 

CY05

3.000

2.817

0.625

0.645

0.031

 

CY08

4.000

2.472

0.625

0.595

-0.050

S–France 1

CY06

4.000

3.200

0.667

0.688

0.030

 

CY07

4.000

2.873

0.667

0.652

-0.023

 

CY11

3.000

2.504

0.583

0.601

0.029

 

CY02

7.000

4.590

0.792

0.782

-0.012

 

CY05

4.000

3.545

0.708

0.718

0.013

 

CY08

5.000

2.830

0.667

0.647

-0.031

S–France 2

CY06

7.000

4.482

0.792

0.777

-0.019

 

CY07

5.000

2.817

0.625

0.645

0.031

 

CY11

3.000

2.521

0.583

0.603

0.033

 

CY02

7.000

3.765

0.750

0.734

-0.021

 

CY05

5.000

4.380

0.750

0.772

0.028

 

CY08

7.000

3.567

0.750

0.720

-0.042

S–France 3

CY06

7.000

4.590

0.792

0.782

-0.012

 

CY07

5.000

3.853

0.750

0.740

-0.013

 

CY11

3.000

2.425

0.583

0.588

0.007

 

CY02

6.000

4.159

0.750

0.760

0.013

 

CY05

4.000

3.418

0.708

0.707

-0.001

 

CY08

6.000

2.931

0.667

0.659

-0.012

S–France 4

CY06

6.000

3.802

0.750

0.737

-0.018

 

CY07

5.000

4.189

0.750

0.761

0.015

 

CY11

3.000

2.395

0.583

0.582

-0.001

 

CY02

5.000

4.414

0.792

0.773

-0.024

 

CY05

4.000

3.273

0.667

0.694

0.040

 

CY08

6.000

3.097

0.667

0.677

0.015

 

TABLE B4. Shown are the number of alleles (Na), number of effective alles (Ne), observed heterozygosity (Ho), expected heterozygostiy (He) and Fixation Index (F) for each locus in each population of C. punctipennis.

Pop

Locus

Na

Ne

Ho

He

F

Oklahoma 1

PU05

7.000

5.260

0.833

0.810

-0.029

 

PU11

7.000

4.204

0.792

0.762

-0.039

 

PU16

7.000

5.097

0.792

0.804

0.015

 

PU06

5.000

3.339

0.708

0.701

-0.011

 

PU7

5.000

3.827

0.750

0.739

-0.015

 

PU10

5.000

3.329

0.708

0.700

-0.012

Oklahoma 2

PU05

7.000

5.143

0.792

0.806

0.017

 

PU11

7.000

4.448

0.792

0.775

-0.021

 

PU16

8.000

4.518

0.792

0.779

-0.017

 

PU06

5.000

3.567

0.708

0.720

0.016

 

PU7

4.000

3.545

0.708

0.718

0.013

 

PU10

5.000

2.859

0.625

0.650

0.039

Oklahoma 3

PU05

6.000

4.235

0.750

0.764

0.018

 

PU11

4.000

1.949

0.500

0.487

-0.027

 

PU16

8.000

5.260

0.833

0.810

-0.029

 

PU06

5.000

4.448

0.750

0.775

0.032

 

PU7

5.000

3.879

0.708

0.742

0.046

 

PU10

4.000

3.879

0.750

0.742

-0.011

Oklahoma 4

PU05

8.000

5.333

0.792

0.813

0.026

 

PU11

4.000

3.480

0.708

0.713

0.006

 

PU16

7.000

4.347

0.750

0.770

0.026

 

PU06

5.000

3.523

0.708

0.716

0.011

 

PU7

4.000

3.388

0.708

0.705

-0.005

 

PU10

4.000

2.931

0.667

0.659

-0.012

Madison 1

PU05

6.000

4.220

0.750

0.763

0.017

 

PU11

4.000

3.056

0.667

0.673

0.009

 

PU16

4.000

3.932

0.750

0.746

-0.006

 

PU06

4.000

2.844

0.667

0.648

-0.028

 

PU7

5.000

3.789

0.750

0.736

-0.019

 

PU10

4.000

3.245

0.667

0.692

0.036

Madison 2

PU05

6.000

3.600

0.750

0.722

-0.038

 

PU11

4.000

3.459

0.708

0.711

0.004

 

PU16

5.000

4.114

0.750

0.757

0.009

 

PU06

4.000

3.567

0.750

0.720

-0.042

 

PU7

4.000

3.491

0.708

0.714

0.007

 

PU10

4.000

3.932

0.750

0.746

-0.006

Madison 3

PU05

8.000

5.460

0.833

0.817

-0.020

 

PU11

6.000

3.032

0.667

0.670

0.005

 

PU16

5.000

4.267

0.750

0.766

0.020

 

PU06

4.000

3.534

0.708

0.717

0.012

 

PU7

4.000

3.589

0.708

0.721

0.018

 

PU10

4.000

2.961

0.667

0.662

-0.007

Madison 4

PU05

7.000

4.251

0.750

0.765

0.019

 

PU11

4.000

3.681

0.750

0.728

-0.030

 

PU16

5.000

4.100

0.750

0.756

0.008

 

PU06

4.000

3.853

0.750

0.740

-0.013

 

PU7

4.000

3.740

0.750

0.733

-0.024

 

PU10

4.000

3.611

0.750

0.723

-0.037

 

TABLE B5. Shown are the number of alleles (Na), number of effective alles (Ne), observed heterozygosity (Ho), expected heterozygostiy (He) and Fixation Index (F) for each locus in each population of C. americanus.

 

Locus

Na

Ne

Ho

He

F

Madison 1

AM01

3.000

2.504

0.583

0.601

0.029

 

AM11

7.000

1.855

0.458

0.461

0.006

 

AM15

4.000

2.817

0.625

0.645

0.031

 

AM12

1.000

1.000

0.000

0.000

#NV

 

AM16

3.000

1.611

0.375

0.379

0.011

 

AM17

4.000

2.661

0.625

0.624

-0.001

Madison 2

AM01

3.000

2.661

0.625

0.624

-0.001

 

AM11

7.000

4.000

0.750

0.750

0.000

 

AM15

6.000

3.827

0.708

0.739

0.041

 

AM12

1.000

1.000

0.000

0.000

#NV

 

AM16

2.000

1.438

0.292

0.305

0.043

 

AM17

2.000

1.946

0.500

0.486

-0.029

Madison 3

AM01

5.000

4.820

0.792

0.793

0.001

 

AM11

7.000

4.944

0.792

0.798

0.008

 

AM15

8.000

4.129

0.750

0.758

0.010

 

AM12

1.000

1.000

0.000

0.000

#NV

 

AM16

2.000

1.087

0.083

0.080

-0.043

 

AM17

2.000

1.087

0.083

0.080

-0.043

Madison 4

AM01

5.000

4.431

0.750

0.774

0.031

 

AM11

7.000

5.408

0.792

0.815

0.029

 

AM15

6.000

3.918

0.750

0.745

-0.007

 

AM12

1.000

1.000

0.000

0.000

#NV

 

AM16

2.000

1.087

0.083

0.080

-0.043

 

AM17

2.000

1.653

0.375

0.395

0.051

Oklahoma 1

AM01

3.000

2.776

0.625

0.640

0.023

 

AM11

4.000

2.477

0.583

0.596

0.022

 

AM15

9.000

4.966

0.792

0.799

0.009

 

AM12

7.000

3.359

0.667

0.702

0.051

 

AM16

2.000

1.843

0.458

0.457

-0.002

 

AM17

5.000

3.657

0.708

0.727

0.025

Oklahoma 2

AM01

3.000

1.997

0.500

0.499

-0.002

 

AM11

5.000

3.378

0.708

0.704

-0.006

 

AM15

4.000

3.480

0.708

0.713

0.006

 

AM12

7.000

2.789

0.667

0.641

-0.039

 

AM16

3.000

2.254

0.542

0.556

0.027

 

AM17

5.000

3.802

0.708

0.737

0.039

Oklahoma 3

AM01

4.000

3.245

0.667

0.692

0.036

 

AM11

4.000

1.753

0.417

0.430

0.030

 

AM15

5.000

3.704

0.750

0.730

-0.027

 

AM12

7.000

3.827

0.708

0.739

0.041

 

AM16

3.000

2.246

0.542

0.555

0.023

 

AM17

8.000

5.703

0.792

0.825

0.040

Oklahoma 4

AM01

4.000

3.523

0.708

0.716

0.011

 

AM11

4.000

1.648

0.375

0.393

0.046

 

AM15

5.000

3.853

0.750

0.740

-0.013

 

AM12

7.000

4.683

0.750

0.786

0.046

 

AM16

3.000

2.228

0.542

0.551

0.017

 

AM17

7.000

5.383

0.792

0.814

0.028

 

TABLE B6. Shown are the number of alleles (Na), number of effective alles (Ne), observed heterozygosity (Ho), expected heterozygostiy (He) and Fixation Index (F) for each locus in each population of C. astictopus.

Pop

Locus

Na

Ne

Ho

He

F

N–Lakeport 1

AS00

6.000

4.220

0.750

0.763

0.017

 

AS01

4.000

2.068

0.500

0.516

0.032

 

AS12

3.000

2.061

0.500

0.515

0.029

 

AS13

5.000

3.534

0.708

0.717

0.012

 

AS15

3.000

2.776

0.625

0.640

0.023

 

AS06

6.000

4.144

0.750

0.759

0.011

N–Lakeport 2

AS00

6.000

4.204

0.750

0.762

0.016

 

AS01

4.000

2.224

0.542

0.550

0.016

 

AS12

3.000

2.076

0.500

0.518

0.035

 

AS13

5.000

3.368

0.708

0.703

-0.007

 

AS15

4.000

3.097

0.667

0.677

0.015

 

AS06

6.000

4.944

0.792

0.798

0.008

N–Lakeport 3

AS00

4.000

3.097

0.667

0.677

0.015

 

AS01

6.000

4.114

0.750

0.757

0.009

 

AS12

5.000

3.480

0.708

0.713

0.006

 

AS13

5.000

3.064

0.667

0.674

0.010

 

AS15

4.000

2.057

0.500

0.514

0.027

 

AS06

6.000

4.299

0.792

0.767

-0.032

S–Lakeport 1

AS00

7.000

4.014

0.750

0.751

0.001

 

AS01

7.000

4.144

0.750

0.759

0.011

 

AS12

4.000

2.939

0.667

0.660

-0.011

 

AS13

5.000

2.837

0.625

0.648

0.035

 

AS15

3.000

2.931

0.667

0.659

-0.012

 

AS06

4.000

2.859

0.667

0.650

-0.025

S–Lakeport 2

AS00

6.000

3.789

0.750

0.736

-0.019

 

AS01

6.000

3.032

0.667

0.670

0.005

 

AS12

3.000

2.946

0.667

0.661

-0.009

 

AS13

6.000

4.518

0.750

0.779

0.037

 

AS15

4.000

3.282

0.667

0.695

0.041

 

AS06

6.000

2.844

0.625

0.648

0.036

S–Lakeport 3

AS00

5.000

3.378

0.708

0.704

-0.006

 

AS01

6.000

3.866

0.750

0.741

-0.012

 

AS12

3.000

2.661

0.625

0.624

-0.001

 

AS13

6.000

3.512

0.708

0.715

0.010

 

AS15

4.000

3.320

0.708

0.699

-0.014

 

AS06

3.000

2.228

0.542

0.551

0.017


[Back to E090-187]